Hi there,

Can you donate $10 per month to support Democracy Now!’s independent journalism all year long? Since our very first broadcast in 1996, we’ve refused to take government or corporate funding, because nothing is more important to us than our editorial independence—especially in this unprecedented election year. When Democracy Now! covers war and peace or the climate crisis, we’re not brought to you by the weapons manufacturers or the oil, gas, coal or nuclear companies. Our journalism is powered by YOU. But that means we can’t do our work without your support. Right now, a generous donor will DOUBLE your gift, which means your $10 donation this month will be worth $20 to Democracy Now! Please do your part right now. We’re all in this together. Thank you so much.
-Amy Goodman

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Donate

Weapons Inspector: Iraq Has No WMDs

HeadlineJan 26, 2004

After months of leading the U.S. search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, David Kay now says he believes stockpiles of such weapons never existed. Kay’s comments mark a major blow to the Bush administration which still claims that the search for weapons of mass destruction is not complete. Kay said “I don’t think they existed.” Up until last week, Kay was heading a team of 1,000 on the hunt for weapons in Iraq. Kay’s replacement, former UN weapons inspector Charles Duelfer, has already said that he does not believe banned weapons would be found. In interviews over the weekend, Kay laid blame on the CIA and the intelligence community for failing to accurately analyze the state of Iraq’s weapons programs.

On Sunday, Secretary of State Colin Powell acknowledged that he too didn’t know if weapons of mass destruction existed in Iraq. When a reporter asked him if such weapons would be found, Powell said “The answer to that question is, we don’t know yet.” He went on to speak about his address to the United Nations outlining the Iraqi threat. He said, “Last year when I made my presentation it was based on the best intelligence we had at the time. What is the open question is how many stocks they had and, if they had any, where did they go? And if they didn’t have any, then why wasn’t that known beforehand?”

Meanwhile Vice President Dick Cheney continued to claim weapons may still be found. He said “I think the jury is still out. It’s going to take … time to look in all of the cubby and ammo dumps in Iraq.”

On the campaign front, the Institute for Public Accuracy has released a report showing that five of the Democratic contenders at one point publicly said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

On October 9, 2002 Senator Kerry said “Why is Saddam Hussein attempting to develop nuclear weapons when most nations don’t even try? … According to intelligence, Iraq has chemical and biological weapons … Iraq is developing unmanned aerial vehicles capable of delivering chemical and biological warfare agents…” Yesterday we asked Kerry at a campaign stop in Nashua to clarify his position.

Meanwhile Senator John Edwards on October 10, 2002 said this about Saddam Hussein. “We know that he has chemical and biological weapons.” Yesterday reporters asked him to comment on his remark.

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.
Make a donation
Top