Hi there,

Can you donate $10 per month to support Democracy Now!’s independent journalism all year long? Since our very first broadcast in 1996, we’ve refused to take government or corporate funding, because nothing is more important to us than our editorial independence—especially in this unprecedented election year. When Democracy Now! covers war and peace or the climate crisis, we’re not brought to you by the weapons manufacturers or the oil, gas, coal or nuclear companies. Our journalism is powered by YOU. But that means we can’t do our work without your support. Right now, a generous donor will DOUBLE your gift, which means your $10 donation this month will be worth $20 to Democracy Now! Please do your part right now. We’re all in this together. Thank you so much.
-Amy Goodman

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Donate

USDA Issues Video News Releases Promoting CAFTA

HeadlineJun 22, 2005

Meanwhile the Chicago Tribune reports the U.S. Department of Agriculture has been doing some lobbying of its own — of the American public. So far this year, the department has produced three dozen video and radio news segments promoting the signing of CAFTA — the Central American Free Trade Agreement. In one radio segment, Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns says “I can’t imagine how any senator or House member from ag country could stand up and vote against CAFTA. It makes no sense to me. It’s voting against our producers.” The segments are designed to look and sound like actual news stories and have been given to over 600 radio and tv stations in rural areas to air during news shows. Senators Daniel Akaka of Hawaii, and Sen. Mary Landrieu, of Louisiana have criticized the video news releases saying “We are concerned that many listeners in rural America may believe these releases are objective news reports, rather than political statements from the USDA which are intended to advance a specific trade agenda.” The USDA has defended the segments because they include taglines at the end identifying the agency as the source.

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.
Make a donation
Top