Hi there,

This month, Democracy Now! marks 29 years of fearless independent journalism. Presidents have come, gone and come back again, but Democracy Now! remains, playing the same critical role in our democracy: shining a spotlight on corporate and government abuses of power and raising up the voices of scholars, advocates, scientists, activists, artists and ordinary people working for a more peaceful and just world. Thanks to a group of generous donors, all donations made today will be DOUBLED, which means your $15 gift is worth $30. If our journalism is important to you, please donate today in honor of our 29th anniversary. Every dollar makes a difference. Thank you so much.

Democracy Now!

Amy Goodman

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Donate

Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Key Campaign Finance Case

HeadlineOct 08, 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments today in a major campaign finance case that is being referred to as “the next Citizens United.” The case, McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, could undermine most of the remaining rules curbing massive spending by wealthy donors. Currently, individuals can spend no more than $123,200 directly on candidates, political parties and political action committees in a single two-year election cycle. That cap includes a limit of $48,600 on direct donations to candidates. But the Republican National Committee, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Republican businessman Shaun McCutcheon want the Supreme Court to throw out the aggregate limits, saying they violate free speech. The case marks the first major challenge to campaign finance rules since the 2010 Citizens United decision, which opened the floodgates for unlimited corporate spending on elections. In a statement, longtime campaign finance advocate Fred Wertheimer said repealing the caps at stake in the McCutcheon case could “recreate the system of legalized bribery that existed prior to the Watergate campaign finance scandals.”

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.
Make a donation
Top